Sunday, March 02, 2008
By Mark Roth, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
When science journalist Seth Shulman began a year of study at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology's Dibner Institute, his goal was to compare the lives of inventors Thomas Edison and Alexander Graham Bell.
That was before he got a look at the original laboratory notebook that Bell kept at the time of his work on the telephone in 1876. In it, Shulman saw a cartoonish drawing of a head bent toward a rudimentary telephone receiver. What struck him about the drawing was that it almost duplicated one in a patent application by a rival inventor, Elisha Gray.
"THE TELEPHONE GAMBIT: CHASING ALEXANDER GRAHAM BELL'S SECRET"
By Seth Shulman
Norton ($24.95)
This book is the story of how Shulman followed up on that first clue to reach the conclusion that Bell had stolen the key technological breakthrough needed to acquire his famous telephone patent from Gray.
The novella-length book cannot absolutely prove that Bell and his backers robbed Gray of his rights to the first commercial telephone, but it lays out a strong case of circumstantial evidence.
At times, Shulman's insistence on taking the reader along with him as he pursues his quest bogs down the book, but that's a minor complaint about an otherwise fascinating tale of what could be the greatest intellectual property theft in history.
In their lifetimes, Gray, an Ohio native who helped establish Western Union, was a much more famous inventor than Bell, a transplanted Scotsman better known for his work with the deaf and his mastery of the art of elocution.
The vital addition to Bell's experiments was a device that suspended a needle in liquid so that sound waves from the person talking into a transmitter would vary the resistance in the electrical circuit running to the receiver. That apparatus is what enabled his assistant, Thomas Watson, to hear Bell on March 10, 1876, when he supposedly spilled battery acid on his pants and yelled, "Watson, come here!"
This "variable resistance" device was described in Gray's preliminary patent application, which was filed before Bell's, and it never appeared in Bell's experiments until after he made a mysterious visit to the patent offices around that time.
Other tantalizing tidbits: Shulman discovered that Bell's description of the liquid transmitter was written into the margin of his original patent application, and he found an affidavit filed 10 years later by patent examiner Zenas Wilber in which he admitted that he let Bell see Gray's paperwork, in part because Wilber owed money to one of the lawyers representing Bell.
Shulman's book may not settle the matter once and for all, but it does unearth a controversy that was well known at the turn of the past century, but has been almost forgotten in the misty decades since.
It is yet one more lesson that the victors of history really do get the spoils.
Elisha Gray won more than 70 patents in his lifetime, many of them pioneering developments in the most famous communication system of his day, the telegraph, yet he died embittered, convinced Bell had stolen the principal idea for the telephone from him.
And after winning his patent, Bell assigned most of the shares of the nascent Bell Telephone Co. to his wife and never worked seriously on his invention after that.
"For all the glory ... I believe Bell remained, on some level, deeply ashamed about the circumstances that led to his patent on the telephone," Shulman writes.
As a reflection on ambition, rivalry, technological development and the way in which history quickly forgets losers in such elemental battles, "The Telephone Gambit" is well worth the read.
Mark Roth can be reached at mroth@post-gazette.com or at 412-263-1130.